Skip to main content
 

CLAS1761: Socrates and the Socratics

Please ensure you check the module availability box for each module outline, as not all modules will run in each academic year. Each module description relates to the year indicated in the module availability box, and this may change from year to year, due to, for example: changing staff expertise, disciplinary developments, the requirements of external bodies and partners, and student feedback. Current modules are subject to change in light of the ongoing disruption caused by Covid-19.

Type Open
Level 1
Credits 20
Availability Not available in 2024/2025
Module Cap
Location Durham
Department Classics and Ancient History

Prerequisites

  • None

Corequisites

  • None

Excluded Combinations of Modules

  • None

Aims

  • To promote the learning and understanding of ancient philosophy in accordance with the general aims of the relevant Degree Programmes, and to broaden students understanding of the culture of Classical antiquity; to develop knowledge of a key period in Western intellectual thought, and introduce philosophical topics, questions and approaches which became foundational for the subsequent tradition.

Content

  • In later antiquity, Socrates was viewed as a watershed in philosophical history, and a reference-point for everything that came after him. Quite how he achieved this status is unclear. Indeed, we do not have clear and consistent evidence even for his beliefs and methods (the Socratic problem) although evidently, he inspired a particular way of doing philosophy, and put the human individual at the centre of inquiry as never before. This course approaches Socrates first and foremost through what we know of his first-generation followers, the Socratics. In doing so, it aims to glimpse the person of Socrates through his most important immediate legacy, while at the same time giving a sense of the philosophical status quaestionis at Athens in the years after Socrates death. As well as Socrates himself, the course will serve as an introduction to Plato and Xenophon (the two Socratics whose works survive), influential minor Socratics including Aeschines, Antisthenes, Aristippus and Phaedo, and the fragmentary evidence for some 23 other figures whom we know to have shared their enthusiasm for Socratic inquiry.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:

  • representative texts which are most important for our understanding of the historical figure of Socrates
  • representative texts written by, or attesting to the work of, the first generation of philosophers inspired by Socrates (the Socratics)
  • the various positions taken among the Socratics (including Plato and Xenophon) on issues including human psychology, happiness, and virtue; politics, theology and education; the scope for identifying Socrates own views on these issues.

Subject-specific Skills:

  • the ability to use textual evidence to develop plausible accounts of particular theoretical positions in their full historical and polemical context
  • an ability to engage critically with the full range of evidence, fragments as well as complete texts, partisan as well as polemical reports, in reconstructing individual philosophical positions
  • confidence in handling and deploying basic philosophical concepts, especially in the field of ethics
  • reflective awareness of the nature of dialectical inquiry.

Key Skills:

  • the ability to present a well-researched, well-articulated, and well-balanced account of diverse evidence
  • the ability to read philosophical texts of a wide range of styles with confidence, and the capacity to identify and engage critically with arguments set out in them.
  • the ability to reconstruct a plausible line of thought from evidence that is imperfect, biased, or indirect.
  • an independence of mind which is strengthened, not compromised, by the sympathetic understanding of alternative points of view.

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • Lectures form the core of the module, being used to provide factual information and to give models for interpretative procedures in the selection and interpretation of fragments. Corresponding to this core is a 70% examination component.
  • Seminars are used to give students practice in the manipulation of important concepts and the analysis of fragments, an opportunity to talk through areas of difficulty. Tutorials are for feedback on formative and coursework assessments. The assessed essay, which constitutes 30% of the final assessment, correspondingly tests students ability to locate, exploit and discuss sources available to them.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

ActivityNumberFrequencyDurationTotalMonitored
Lectures22Weekly1 hour22 
Tutorials21 hour2 
Seminars41 hour4 
Preparation and reading time172 
Total200 

Summative Assessment

Component: EssayComponent Weighting: 30%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Essay2,500 words100 
Component: Written examinationComponent Weighting: 70%
ElementLength / DurationElement WeightingResit Opportunity
Written examination2 hours100 

Formative Assessment

One essay of 1,500 words on a given topic in each of Michaelmas and Epiphany Terms.

More information

If you have a question about Durham's modular degree programmes, please visit our FAQ webpages, Help page or our glossary of terms. If you have a question about modular programmes that is not covered by the FAQ, or a query about the on-line Undergraduate Module Handbook, please contact us.

Prospective Students: If you have a query about a specific module or degree programme, please Ask Us.

Current Students: Please contact your department.