Staff profile
Affiliation | Telephone |
---|---|
Associate Professor in Biolaw in the Durham Law School | |
Associate Professor in Biolaw in the Durham CELLS (Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences) | |
Fellow of the Institute for Medical Humanities |
Biography
Elizabeth Chloe Romanis joined Durham Law School in September 2020.
Chloe has a first class LLB (Hons) Law degree and a distinction LLM in Health Care Ethics and Law both from the University of Manchester. She passed her Wellcome Trust-funded PhD in Bioethics and Medical Jurisprudence at the University of Manchester with no corrections in September 2020. During her PhD she spent a semester as a visiting postgraduate researcher in Reproductive and Sexual Health Law at the University of Toronto, Canada.
In 2020 Chloe was awarded the University of Manchester Distinguished Achievement Medal for Postgraduate Researcher of the Year (FHUMS) and a Faculty of Humanities Outstanding Teacher Award. In 2021, Chloe was awarded the Durham Law School Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Staff Award. From August 2024, she is the Director of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion at the Law School.
From September 2022-June 2023, Chloe Romanis undertook a Fellowship-in-Residence at the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics and the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics (Harvard Law) at Harvard University. She is an adjunct researcher in the University of Zurich's Human Reproduction Reloaded research programme.
Chloe is the current co-Editor-in-Chief of Medical Law International.
Chloe welcomes PhD applications from students in any of her areas of expertise especially in reproduction and the law.
Research
Chloe does research in healthcare law and bioethics with a particular interest in reproduction and the body (abortion, gestation, pregnancy and birth). Chloe's principal publications concern artificial womb technology and are published in leading journals including the Modern Law Review, Medical Law Review, Journal of Law and the Biosciences and the Journal of Medical Ethics. Chloe has also published widely on matters related to abortion and childbirth.
Her first book, co-authored with Jordan A Parsons of the University of Bristol, 'Early Medical Abortion, Equality of Access, and the Telemedical Imperative,' was published by Oxford University Press in September 2021.
Her second book, supported by fellowships from Harvard University and the Future of Human Reproduction project (Wellcome Trust Project at Lancaster University), titled 'Biotechnology, Gestation, and the Law,' will be published by Oxford University Press in early 2025.
Teaching Areas
- Advanced Issues in Criminal Law
- Contemporary Issues in Biolaw
- Contemporary Issues in Medical Law and Ethics
- Law and Social Justice
Chloe's edited textbook (with Dr Sabrina Germain and Professor Jonathan Herring), 'Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives,' will be published by Bristol University Press in 2025.
Research interests
- Bioethics
- Feminist Legal Studies
- Healthcare Law
- Reproduction
Publications
Authored book
- Biotechnology, Gestation, and the LawRomanis, E. C. (in press). Biotechnology, Gestation, and the Law. Oxford University Press.
- Early Medical Abortion, Equality of Access, and the Telemedical ImperativeParsons, J. A., & Romanis, E. C. (2021). Early Medical Abortion, Equality of Access, and the Telemedical Imperative. Oxford University Press.
Chapter in book
- (Dis)proportionate Abortion Care Regulation and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Great BritainParsons, J. A., & Romanis, E. C. (in press). (Dis)proportionate Abortion Care Regulation and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Great Britain. In Proportionality: A Guiding Principle in Public Health Law, Ethics and Policy. Oxford University Press.
- Pregnancy and BirthRomanis, E. C., & Mahmoud, Z. (in press). Pregnancy and Birth. In E. C. Romanis, S. Germain, & J. Herring (Eds.), Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives. Bristol University Press.
- Medical NegligenceTongue, Z., Romanis, E. C., & Germain, S. (in press). Medical Negligence. In E. C. Romanis, S. Germain, & J. Herring (Eds.), Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives. Bristol University Press.
- ConfidentialityRomanis, E. C., Parsons, J. A., & Jones, N. (in press). Confidentiality. In E. C. Romanis, S. Germain, & J. Herring (Eds.), Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives. Bristol University Press.
- IntroductionRomanis, E. C., Germain, S., & Herring, J. (in press). Introduction. In E. C. Romanis, S. Germain, & J. Herring (Eds.), Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives. Bristol University Press.
- Subjective Experience, Gestational Preferences and Justice: Valuing Both Uterus Transplantation and EctogestationRomanis, E. C., & Kendal, E. (2024). Subjective Experience, Gestational Preferences and Justice: Valuing Both Uterus Transplantation and Ectogestation. In N. Hammond-Browning & N. J. Williams (Eds.), International Legal and Ethical Perspectives on Uterus Transplantation (Elgar Studies in Health and the Law) (pp. 104-123). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803920498.00015
- Establishing Boundaries for Speculation About Artificial Wombs, Ectogenesis, Gender, and the Gestating BodyHorn, C., & Romanis, E. C. (2020). Establishing Boundaries for Speculation About Artificial Wombs, Ectogenesis, Gender, and the Gestating Body. In C. Dietz, M. Travis, & M. Thomson (Eds.), A Jurisprudence of the Body (pp. 227-254). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42200-4_10
Edited book
- Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important PerspectivesRomanis, E., Germain, S., & Herring, J. (Eds.). (in press). Diverse Voices in Health Law and Ethics: Important Perspectives. Bristol University Press.
Journal Article
- Mens Pregnancies and Nonbinary Pregnancies in The Law: Ontic Injustice and/or InvisibilizationRomanis, E. C. (2025). Mens Pregnancies and Nonbinary Pregnancies in The Law: Ontic Injustice and/or Invisibilization. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251333871
- Value sensitive design and the artificial placenta.Romanis, E. C., Segers, S., & de Jong, B. (2024). Value sensitive design and the artificial placenta. Journal of Medical Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110066
- Legal parenthood, novel reproductive practices, and the disruption of reproductive biosexRomanis, E. C., & Brown, A. (2024). Legal parenthood, novel reproductive practices, and the disruption of reproductive biosex. Modern Law Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12914
- Death and the artificial placentaNelson, A., Romanis, E. C., Adkins, V., Weis, C., & Kuberska, K. (2024). Death and the artificial placenta. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 11(2), Article lsae013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsae013
- AAPT, pregnancy loss and planning aheadAdkins, V., & Romanis, E. C. (2024). AAPT, pregnancy loss and planning ahead. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50, 318-319. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-109934
- "All hands on deck": a qualitative study of safeguarding and the transition to telemedical abortion care in England and Wales.Parsons, J. A., Parsons, J. A., & Romanis, E. C. (2024). "All hands on deck": a qualitative study of safeguarding and the transition to telemedical abortion care in England and Wales. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 348, Article 116835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116835
- Framing a future research agenda for Medical Law InternationalRomanis, E. C., Devaney, S., Mullock, A., & Black, I. (2024). Framing a future research agenda for Medical Law International. Medical Law International, 24(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332241242270
- Translational or translationable? A call for ethno-immersion in (empirical) bioethics researchParsons, J. A., Johal, H., Parker, J., & Romanis, E. C. (2024). Translational or translationable? A call for ethno-immersion in (empirical) bioethics research. Bioethics, 38(3), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13184
- Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive careRomanis, E. C., & Adkins, V. (2024). Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(5), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109412
- Early telemedical abortion, safeguarding, and under 18s: a qualitative study with care providers in England and WalesRomanis, E. C., & Parsons, J. A. (2023). Early telemedical abortion, safeguarding, and under 18s: a qualitative study with care providers in England and Wales. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201762
- R v Foster: Exemplifying the urgency of the decriminalisation of abortionRomanis, E. C. (2023). R v Foster: Exemplifying the urgency of the decriminalisation of abortion. Medical Law Review, 31(4), 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad026
- Equality-enhancing potential of novel forms of assisted gestation: Perspectives of reproductive rights advocatesRomanis, E. C. (2023). Equality-enhancing potential of novel forms of assisted gestation: Perspectives of reproductive rights advocates. Bioethics, 37(7), 637-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13187
- ‘The law is very, very outdated and not keeping up with the technology’: novel forms of assisted gestation, legal challenges, and perspectives of reproductive rights advocates in England and WalesRomanis, C. (2023). ‘The law is very, very outdated and not keeping up with the technology’: novel forms of assisted gestation, legal challenges, and perspectives of reproductive rights advocates in England and Wales. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 10(2), Article lsad027. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad027
- Abortion Access and the Benefits and Limitations of Abortion-Permissive Legal Frameworks: Lessons from the United KingdomRomanis, E. C. (2023). Abortion Access and the Benefits and Limitations of Abortion-Permissive Legal Frameworks: Lessons from the United Kingdom. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(3), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1017/s096318012200086x
- Cryopreservation and current legal problems: seeking and selling immortalityRomanis, C., & Mullock, A. (2023). Cryopreservation and current legal problems: seeking and selling immortality. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 10(2), Article lsad028. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad028
- The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and WalesHalliday, S., Romanis, E. C., De Proost, L., & Verweij, E. (Joanne). (2023). The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales. Medical Law Review, 31(4), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad015
- The Ethical and Legal Status of ‘Fetonates’ Or ‘Gestatelings’Romanis, E. C. (2023). The Ethical and Legal Status of ‘Fetonates’ Or ‘Gestatelings’. The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2191030
- The relationship between speculation and translation in Bioethics: methods and methodologiesJohnson, T., & Romanis, E. C. (2023). The relationship between speculation and translation in Bioethics: methods and methodologies. Monash Bioethics Review, 41, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-023-00181-z
- The end of (reproductive) liberty as we know it: A note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health 597 USC __ (2022)Romanis, E. C. (2023). The end of (reproductive) liberty as we know it: A note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health 597 USC __ (2022). Medical Law International, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231154562
- On Gestation and MotherhoodMahmoud, Z., & Romanis, E. C. (2023). On Gestation and Motherhood. Medical Law Review, 31(1), 109-140. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac030
- Directed and Conditional Uterus DonationRomanis, E. C., & Parsons, J. A. (2022). Directed and Conditional Uterus Donation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(11), 810-815. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107902
- Assisted Gestative TechnologiesRomanis, E. C. (2022). Assisted Gestative Technologies. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(7), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107769
- The case for telemedical early medical abortion in England: dispelling adult safeguarding concernsParsons, J. A., & Romanis, E. C. (2022). The case for telemedical early medical abortion in England: dispelling adult safeguarding concerns. Health Care Analysis, 30(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-021-00439-9
- Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to RäsänenBegovic, D., Romanis, E. C., & Joanne Verweij, E. (2022). Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(2), 139-141. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107363
- Reviewing the wombRomanis, E. C., Begović, D., Brazier, M. R., & Mullock, A. K. (2022). Reviewing the womb. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12), 820-829. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106160
- The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the United Kingdom: The Case for ReformRomanis, E. C., Mullock, A., & Parsons, J. A. (2022). The Excessive Regulation of Early Abortion Medication in the United Kingdom: The Case for Reform. Medical Law Review, 30(1), 4-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab042
- Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative TechnologiesSegers, S., & Romanis, E. C. (2022). Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative Technologies. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 15, 2207-2220. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s358553
- Artificial Womb Technology, Pregnancy and EU Employment RightsHooton, V., & Romanis, E. C. (2022). Artificial Womb Technology, Pregnancy and EU Employment Rights. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(1), Article 009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac009
- Appropriately framing maternal request caesarean sectionRomanis, E. C. (2022). Appropriately framing maternal request caesarean section. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48, 554-556. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107806
- Surrogacy and uterus transplantation using live donors: Examining the options from the perspective of ‘womb‐givers’Mullock, A., Romanis, E. C., & Begović, D. (2021). Surrogacy and uterus transplantation using live donors: Examining the options from the perspective of ‘womb‐givers’. Bioethics, 35(8), 820-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12921
- Safeguarding and Teleconsultation for AbortionRomanis, E. C., Parsons, J. A., Salter, I., & Hampton, T. (2021). Safeguarding and Teleconsultation for Abortion. The Lancet, 398(10299), 555-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736%2821%2901062-x
- ‘Abortion & "Artificial Wombs": Would ‘artificial womb’ technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about how to terminate a pregnancy?'Romanis, E. C. (2021). ‘Abortion & "Artificial Wombs": Would ‘artificial womb’ technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about how to terminate a pregnancy?’. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab011
- Sally Sheldon and Kaye Wellings (eds), Decriminalising Abortion in the UK: What Would It Mean?Romanis, E. C. (2021). Sally Sheldon and Kaye Wellings (eds), Decriminalising Abortion in the UK: What Would It Mean?. Medical Law Review, 29(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaa033
- 2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UKParsons, J. A., & Romanis, E. C. (2021). 2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UK. Health Policy, 125(1), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.006
- The Medicalisation of Childbirth and Access to Homebirth in the UK: COVID-19 and BeyondNelson, A., & Romanis, E. C. (2021). The Medicalisation of Childbirth and Access to Homebirth in the UK: COVID-19 and Beyond. Medical Law Review, 29(4), 661-687. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab040
- Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID‐19Romanis, E. C., & Parsons, J. A. (2020). Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID‐19. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 151(3), 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13377
- Maternal request caesareans and COVID-19: the virus does not diminish the importance of choice in childbirthRomanis, E. C., & Nelson, A. (2020). Maternal request caesareans and COVID-19: the virus does not diminish the importance of choice in childbirth. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(11), 726-731. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106526
- Homebirthing in the United Kingdom during COVID-19Romanis, E. C., & Nelson, A. (2020). Homebirthing in the United Kingdom during COVID-19. Medical Law International, 20(3), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220955224
- Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?Romanis, E. C. (2020). Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?. Bioethics, 34(4), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12701
- COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemicRomanis, E. C., Parsons, J. A., & Hodson, N. (2020). COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa027
- Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation: A Misplaced Focus? Technology, Abortion, and Reproductive FreedomRomanis, E. C., & Horn, C. (2020). Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation: A Misplaced Focus? Technology, Abortion, and Reproductive Freedom. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 13(2), 174-194. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.13.2.18
- Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law?Romanis, E. C. (2020). Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law?. Medical Law Review, 28(2), 342-374. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwz037
- Is ‘viability’ viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United StatesRomanis, E. C. (2020). Is ‘viability’ viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), Article lsaa059. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa059
- Addressing Rising Cesarean Rates: Maternal Request Cesareans, Defensive Practice, and the Power of Choice in ChildbirthRomanis, E. C. (2020). Addressing Rising Cesarean Rates: Maternal Request Cesareans, Defensive Practice, and the Power of Choice in Childbirth. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 13(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.13.1.01
- Challenging the ‘Born Alive’ Threshold: Fetal Surgery, Artificial Wombs, and the English Approach to Legal PersonhoodRomanis, E. C. (2020). Challenging the ‘Born Alive’ Threshold: Fetal Surgery, Artificial Wombs, and the English Approach to Legal Personhood. Medical Law Review, 28(1), 93-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwz014
- Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspectiveRomanis, E. C. (2020). Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105968
- Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically ImpermissibleRomanis, E. C. (2019). Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible. Health Care Analysis, 27(4), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0
- Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)Romanis, E. C. (2019). Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses). Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(11), 728-729. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105723
- Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implicationsRomanis, E. C. (2018). Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(11), 751-755. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104910
- Pregnant women may have moral obligations to foetuses they have chosen to carry to term, but the law should never intervene in a woman’s choices during pregnancyRomanis, E. C. (2017). Pregnant women may have moral obligations to foetuses they have chosen to carry to term, but the law should never intervene in a woman’s choices during pregnancy. The Manchester Review of Law, Crime and Ethics, 6, 69-85.