This page shows examples of TEI good practice highlighted by the External Examiners and the ULOs in their reports, in areas related to assessment and moderation. Click on the links below to jump to Good Practice ideas on each topic.
ERMC
(2020-21)
Lindisfarne
YTEP (2021-22)
SWMTC (2021-22)
Lincoln (2021-22)
All Saints Centre
St Augustine’s
The ASE Reviewer commended how the TEI uses Assessed Conversations in the module on Job; by building the module around the idea of dialogue and including video dialogues in the resources, the TEI is skilfully integrating assessed conversations into the big picture. This also improved engagement in the lesson preparation, especially from students with SpLDs.
A number of modular assessments include excellent creative elements where students can demonstrate abilities in graphic design, blogging, copy for websites, magazines or newspapers. This promotes clear “employment-related” skills.
Cranmer Hall
The TEI uses assessed conversation as an alternative assessment method for some students with specific learning needs (especially dyslexia). This has been valued by students and has proved an effective alternative to written assignments.
SCTEI (Oxford)
SEI
SWMTC
Ripon College, Cuddesdon (2021-22)
Luther King Centre (2021-22)
CamFed
CCL
Queen's
SWMTC’s approach to formative assessments was commended by the ASE reviewer. The TEI provides asynchronous tasks for students to work through online, and students are asked to respond to the task and engage with each other via Moodle Forums. This is an effective way of preparing students for summative work without overloading them.
The TEI Notes: 'some of our modules have around 50% (one or two have more like 80%) of the teaching material in the form of readings and/or videos which students access asynchronously on Moodle. These are presented in blocks, which should each take about 2 hours to work through, and each block also include questions which the students are asked to think or write about. In conclusion to each block, in an effort to consolidate learning, we then ask each student to respond to one or more questions by writing at least 100 words as a thread on a forum. Together, these constitute their formative work for the module.(They are allowed to write more if they wish but we do not want to over-burden them with excessive expectations.) Students can access, and may respond to, each other’s threads. The tutor can then assess how well the students have understood the work and responds to the group as a whole by their own thread in the forum, or by email/announcement or by addressing specific issues in the next ‘live’ class.'
The External Examiner highlighted the TEI's outstanding use of moderation. Not only does their practice ensure consistent and justified academic standards but is of great developmental value. Excellent use is made of the right hand form in Moodle to facilitate a dialogue between the first marker and moderator. In the vast majority of cases these conversations were honest, constructive and gave confidence that the module marking was accurate and consistent. Importantly, they were also developmental conversations.
* First markers were not afraid to ask for a second opinion on specific assessments where marking was challenging
* The assessment criteria were used to frame the conversation, along with encouragement to use the set of qualitative phrases (excellent, very good, good, sound) consistently
* Mark changes were justified, and the conversation brought to an agreed conclusion
* Moderators explained and identified their selection of assessments
* Markers were encouraged to complete each box of the grading form (and the vast majority did)
* Advice was given on the tone of feedback and its ability to result in improved student performance
* Future changes to assessments were mooted where it was felt existing arrangements had led to confusion or under performance
* Students with learning differences and those in need of further support were served well by the process
SCTEI
TBBC
SEI (2021-22)
SCTEI (2021-22)