Staff profile
Professor Nancy Cartwright
Professor/Director of CHESS - No general enquiries (please refer to the contact us page)
Affiliation | Telephone |
---|---|
Professor/Director of CHESS - No general enquiries (please refer to the contact us page) in the Department of Philosophy |
Biography
Nancy Cartwright FBA FAcSS is Professor of Philosophy at Durham University and a Distinguished Professor at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD). At Durham she is also co-Director of the Centre for Humanities engaging Science and Society. In the first half of her career at Stanford University she specialised in the philosophy of the natural sciences, especially physics; in the second half, at the London School of Economics and now Durham and UCSD, she has specialised in philosophy and methodology of the social sciences with special attention to economics. Her current research focusses on objectivity and evidence, especially for evidence-based policy, and on improving policy predictions.
Her research interests include philosophy and history of science (especially physics and economics). Cartwright has worked extensively in modelling, causal inference, causal powers, and objectivity, evidence, especially for evidence-based policy [EBP] and the philosophy of social technology. Her recent work, for the project ‘Knowledge for Use’ [K4U], investigated how to use scientific research results for better policies. She has worked with others on projects in this area on education, child protection and international development.
Professor Cartwright has written a number of books: A Philosopher Looks at Science (2022), The Tangle of Science: Reliability beyond Method, Rigour, and Objectivity, Nature the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World, and How We Can Arrange It Better (2019), Improving Child Safety: deliberation, judgement and empirical research [with E Munro, J Hardie & E Montuschi] (2017), Evidence: For Policy and Wheresoever Rigor is a Must (2013), Evidence Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing it Better [with J Hardie] (2012), Causal Powers: What Are They? Why Do We Need Them? What Can be Done with Them and What Cannot (2007), Measuring Causes: Invariance, Modularity and the Causal Markov Condition (2000), Hunting Causes and Using Them (2007), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (1999), Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics [with J Cat, K Fleck & T Uebel] (1995), Nature's Capacities and their Measurement (1989) and How the Laws of Physics Lie (1983).
She has also co-edited three collections: Rethinking Order: After the Laws of Nature [with K Ward] (2016), Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction [with Eleonora Montuschi] (2014), and Idealization XII: Correcting the Models. Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences [with M R Jones] (2005).
Nancy Cartwright is a Fellow of the British Academy and the Academy of Social Sciences. She is also a member of the American Philosophical Society, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the German Academy of Sciences (Leopoldina) and the Academy of Europe and a recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship.
Cartwright has received two honorary doctorate degrees from the University of St Andrews and the Southern Methodist University and has been awarded the Hypatia European Science Prize, the Hempel Award for lifetime achievement of Philosophy of Science and the Martin R Lebowitz Prize (alongside Elliott Sober) for philosophical achievement and contribution by the Phi Beta Kappa Society.
Click here for Nancy Cartwright's CVOffice Hours
Prof Nancy Cartwright is mostly on research leave right now. For an appointment, email her or admin.chess@durham.ac.uk to make arangements.
Research interests
- History and philosophy of science (especially physics and economics)
- The philosophy of social technology
- Causal inference
- Objectivity in science
- Evidence, especially for evidence-based policy
Esteem Indicators
- 2018: Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE) Distinguished Lecture Series at the National Science Foundation (NSF) Headquarters:
- 2018: The Wesley C. Salmon Memorial Lecture, Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh:
- 2017: Carus Lectures (APA 2017 Pacific Division Meeting), Seattle:
- 2017: The Martin R. Lebowitz Prize for Philosophical Achievement awarded by the Phi Beta Kappa Society (alongside Elliott Sober):
- 2017: Senior Research Associate at the African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science (ACEPS), University of Johannesburg:
- 2016: Associate Member, Senior Common Room at Wadham College, Oxford:
- 2016: Fellow, The Academy of Social Sciences:
- 2015: John Dewey Lecture: 2015 Pacific Division APA meeting:
- 2014: Tsing Hua Honorary Distinguished Chair Professor, awarded by the National Tsing Hua University:
- 2013: Honorary Degree, Doctor of Letters, honoris causa, University of St Andrews:
- 2012: Honorary Degree. Doctor of Humane Letters, honors causa, Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX:
- 2012: 225 Medallion, Distinguished Alumna, University of Pittsburgh:
- 2011: Member, Doctorate School in Philosophy of the Universita 'Ca' Foscari', Venice:
- 2009: Chancellor’s Associates Faculty Excellence Award for Excellence in Research in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California at San Diego:
- 2008: President, Philosophy of Science Association:
- 2008: President, American Philosophical Association (Pacific Division):
- 2007: Titular Member, Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences (A.I.P.S.):
- 2007: Fellow, Institute for Advanced Study, Durham University:
- 2007: Vice-President, American Philosophical Association (Pacific Division):
- 2005: Senior Visiting Fellow, Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Bologna:
- 2004: Fellow, American Philosophical Society:
- 2002: Associate Member, Nuffield College, Oxford:
- 2001: Foreign Honorary Member, American Academy of Arts and Science:
- 1999: Member, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (The German National Academy of Natural Science):
- 1996: Fellow, British Academy:
- 1996: Old Dominion Fellow, Philosophy, Princeton University:
- 1993: Fellow, MacArthur Foundation:
- 1987: Fellow, Wissenschaftskolleg (Institute for Advanced Study), Berlin:
- 1982: Fellow, ZiF (Center for Interdisciplinary Research), Bielefeld, Germany:
- 1976: Fellow, Philosophy of Science Center, University of Pittsburgh:
- 1971: Postdoctoral Fellow, U.S. National Science Foundation, Cambridge University:
Publications
Authored book
- The Tangle of Science: Reliability Beyond Method, Rigour, and ObjectivityCartwright, N., Hardie, J., Montuschi, E., Soleiman, S., & Thresher, A. (2022). The Tangle of Science: Reliability Beyond Method, Rigour, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
- A Philosopher Looks at ScienceCartwright, N. (2022). A Philosopher Looks at Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009201896
- Nature the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World, and How We Can Arrange It Better. The 2017 Carus LecturesCartwright, N. (2019). Nature the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World, and How We Can Arrange It Better. The 2017 Carus Lectures. Open Court.
- Improving Child Safety: deliberation, judgement and empirical researchMunro, E., Cartwright, N., Hardie, J., & Montuschi, E. (2017). Improving Child Safety: deliberation, judgement and empirical research. Centre for Humanities Engaging Science and Society (CHESS).
- Evidence: For Policy and Wheresoever Rigor is a MustCartwright, N. D. (2013). Evidence: For Policy and Wheresoever Rigor is a Must. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
- Evidence Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing it BetterCartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing it Better. Oxford University Press.
- Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and PoliticsCartwright, N., Cat, J., Fleck, L., & Uebel, T. (2008). Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
- Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics.Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511618758
- Causal powers: what are they? why do we need them? what can be done with them and what cannot?Cartwright, N. (2007). Causal powers: what are they? why do we need them? what can be done with them and what cannot?. London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Measuring Causes: Invariance, Modularity and the Causal Markov Condition.Cartwright, N. (2000). Measuring Causes: Invariance, Modularity and the Causal Markov Condition. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE.
- The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of ScienceCartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.
- Nature's Capacities and Their MeasurementCartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.
- How the Laws of Physics LieCartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247044.001.0001
Chapter in book
- Evidence, Relevance and Warrant: In Defence of VoluntarismCartwright, N. (2024). Evidence, Relevance and Warrant: In Defence of Voluntarism. In C. Beisbart & M. Frauchiger (Eds.), Scientific Theories and Philosophical Stances: Themes from van Fraassen (pp. 193-206). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111019802-013
- How Should Evidence Inform Education Policy?Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N. (2022). How Should Evidence Inform Education Policy?. In R. Curren (Ed.), Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172246-9
- How to Learn about Causes in the Single CaseCartwright, N. (2022). How to Learn about Causes in the Single Case (J. Widner, M. Woolcock, & D. Ortega Nieto, Eds.; pp. 29-51). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108688253.003
- Commentary: Why Mixed Methods Are Necessary for Evaluating Any PolicyCartwright, N. (2019). Commentary: Why Mixed Methods Are Necessary for Evaluating Any Policy. In M. Nagatsu & A. Ruzzene (Eds.), Contemporary philosophy and social science : an interdisciplinary dialogue. (pp. 173-184). Bloomsbury.
- Street-level Theories of Change: Adapting the Medical Model of Evidence-based Practice for Policing.Cartwright, N., & Cowen, N. (2019). Street-level Theories of Change: Adapting the Medical Model of Evidence-based Practice for Policing. In N. Fielding, K. Bullock, & S. Holdaway (Eds.), Evidence-Based Policing: Critical Reflections. Routledge.
- Will Your Policy Work? Experiments versus ModelsCartwright, N. (2018). Will Your Policy Work? Experiments versus Models. In I. Peschard & B. van Frassen (Eds.), The experimental side of modeling.. University of Minnesota Press.
- Modeling mitigation and adaptation policies to predict their effectiveness: The limits of randomized controlled trialsMarcellesi, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Modeling mitigation and adaptation policies to predict their effectiveness: The limits of randomized controlled trials. In E. Lloyd & E. Winsberg (Eds.), Climate modelling : philosophical and conceptual issues. (pp. 449-480). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65058-6_15
- Are laws of nature consistent with contingency?Cartwright, N., & Merlussi, P. (2018). Are laws of nature consistent with contingency?. In W. Ott & L. Patto (Eds.), Laws of Nature, an anthology (pp. 221-244). Oxford University Press.
- A Theory of MeasurementCartwright, N., Bradburn, N., & Fuller, J. (2017). A Theory of Measurement. In L. McClimans (Ed.), Measurement in medicine : philosophical essays on assessment and evaluation.. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Can Structural Equations Explain How Mechanisms Explain?Cartwright, N. (2017). Can Structural Equations Explain How Mechanisms Explain?. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, & H. Price (Eds.), Making a difference : essays on the philosophy of causation. (pp. 132-152). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198746911.003.0008
- Causal Powers: Why Humeans Can't Even Be InstrumentalistsCartwright, N. (2017). Causal Powers: Why Humeans Can’t Even Be Instrumentalists. In J. D. Jacobs (Ed.), Causal powers. (pp. 9-23). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796572.003.0002
- Single Case Causes: What is Evidence and WhyCartwright, N. (2016). Single Case Causes: What is Evidence and Why. In H. Chao & J. Reiss (Eds.), Philosophy of science in practice : Nancy Cartwright and the nature of scientific reasoning. (pp. 11-24). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45532-7_2
- Economics as ScienceCartwright, N., & Davis, J. (2016). Economics as Science. In R. Skidelsky & N. Craig (Eds.), Who runs the economy? The role of power in economics. (pp. 43-55). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58017-7_4
- Deliberating Policy: Where morals and methods mixCartwright, N., & Marcellesi, A. (2016). Deliberating Policy: Where morals and methods mix. In M. Couch & J. Pfeifer (Eds.), The philosophy of Philip Kitcher. (pp. 229-252). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199381357.003.0010
- The Dethronement of Laws in ScienceCartwright, N. (2016). The Dethronement of Laws in Science. In N. Cartwright & K. Ward (Eds.), Rethinking order : after the laws of nature. (pp. 25-52). Bloomsbury Academic.
- The Natural and the Moral Order: What’s to Blame?Cartwright, N. (2016). The Natural and the Moral Order: What’s to Blame?. In W. Doniger, P. Galison, & S. Neiman (Eds.), What reason promises : essays on reason, nature, and history. (pp. 13-18). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110455113-004
- How Could Laws Make Things Happen?Cartwright, N. (2015). How Could Laws Make Things Happen?. In N. Spurway (Ed.), Laws of Nature, Laws of God? Proceedings of the Science and Religion Forum Conference 2014 (pp. 115-135). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- EBP: Where Rigor MattersCartwright, N., & Marcellesi, A. (2015). EBP: Where Rigor Matters. In C. Crangle, A. García de la Sienra, & H. E. Longino (Eds.), Foundations and methods from mathematics to neuroscience : essays inspired by Patrick Suppes.. CSLI Publications.
- CausalityCartwright, N. (2014). Causality. In N. Cartwright & E. Montuschi (Eds.), Philosophy of Social Science. A New Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- MeasurementCartwright, N. (2014). Measurement. In N. Cartwright & E. Montuschi (Eds.), Philosophy of Social Science. A New Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Aristotelian Powers: Without Them, What Would Modern Science Do?Cartwright, N., & Pemberton, J. (2013). Aristotelian Powers: Without Them, What Would Modern Science Do?. In J. Greco & R. Gross (Eds.), Powers and capacities in philosophy : the new Aristotelianism. (pp. 93-112). Routledge.
- Evidence, Argument and PredictionCartwright, N. (2013). Evidence, Argument and Prediction. In V. Karakostas & D. Dieks (Eds.), EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings 2. Springer Verlag.
- Queen Physics: How Much of the Globe is Painted Red?Cartwright, N., & Martin, E. (2012). Queen Physics: How Much of the Globe is Painted Red?. In F. Watts & C. Knight (Eds.), God and the scientist : exploring the work of John Polkinghorne. (pp. 67-76). Ashgate Publishing.
- RCT’s, Evidence and Predicting Policy EffectivenessCartwright, N. (2012). RCT’s, Evidence and Predicting Policy Effectiveness. In H. Kincaid (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (pp. 298-318). Oxford University Press.
- A Theory of Evidence for Evidence-Based PolicyCartwright, N., & Stegenga, J. (2011). A Theory of Evidence for Evidence-Based Policy. In P. Dawid, W. Twining, & M. Vasilaki (Eds.), Evidence, inference and enquiry. (pp. 291-322). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264843.003.0011
- Evidence, External Validity and Explanatory RelevanceCartwright, N. (2011). Evidence, External Validity and Explanatory Relevance. In G. J. Morgan (Ed.), Philosophy of science matters : the philosophy of Peter Achinstein. (pp. 15-28). Oxford University Press.
- Predicting 'It Will Work for Us': (Way) Beyond StatisticsCartwright, N. (2011). Predicting ’It Will Work for Us’: (Way) Beyond Statistics. In P. Illari, F. Russo, & J. Williamson (Eds.), Causality in the sciences.. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199574131.001.0001
- A Theory of MeasurementCartwright, N., & Bradburn, N. (2011). A Theory of Measurement. In R. M. Li (Ed.), The importance of common metrics for advancing social science theory and research: a workshop summary. (pp. 53-56). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13034
- Natural Laws and the Closure of Physics.Cartwright, N. (2010). Natural Laws and the Closure of Physics. In R. Chiao, A. Leggett, M. Cohen, & C. Harper (Eds.), Visions of Discovery. New Light on Physics, Cosmology and Consciousness (pp. 612-622). Cambridge University Press.
- Relativism in the Philosophy of Science.Cartwright, N. (2010). Relativism in the Philosophy of Science. In M. Krausz (Ed.), Relativism: A Contemporary Anthology (pp. 86-99). Columbia University Press.
- ForewordCartwright, N. (2010). Foreword. In J. Woods (Ed.), Fictions and Models: New Essays. Philosophia Verlag.
- Models: Parables v FablesCartwright, N. D. (2010). Models: Parables v Fables. In R. Frigg & M. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention Representation In Art and Science (pp. 19-31). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_2
- What is this thing called 'efficacy'?Cartwright, N. D. (2009). What is this thing called ’efficacy’?. In C. Mantzavinos (Ed.), Philosophy of the social sciences : philosophical theory and scientific practice. (pp. 185-206). Cambridge University Press.
- Causal Laws, Policy Predictions, and the Need for Genuine PowersCartwright, N. (2009). Causal Laws, Policy Predictions, and the Need for Genuine Powers. In T. Handfield (Ed.), Dispositions and Causes. Oxford University Press.
- Causality, Invariance and PolicyCartwright, N. (2009). Causality, Invariance and Policy. In H. Kincaid & D. Ross (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics. (pp. 410-423). Oxford University Press.
- MeasurementCartwright, N., & Chang, H. (2008). Measurement. In S. Psillos & M. Curd (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
- In Praise of the Representation TheoremCartwright, N. (2008). In Praise of the Representation Theorem. In M. Frauchiger & W. Essler (Eds.), Representation, evidence, and justification : themes from Suppes (pp. 83-90). Ontos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110323566.83
- RepliesCartwright, N. (2008). Replies. In S. Hartmann, C. Hoefer, & L. Bovens (Eds.), Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
- Why be Hanged for Even a Lamb?Cartwright, N. (2008). Why be Hanged for Even a Lamb?. In B. Monton (Ed.), Images of empiricism. (pp. 32-45). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199218844.003.0003
- Causal Laws, Policy Predictions and the Need for Genuine PowersCartwright, N. (2007). Causal Laws, Policy Predictions and the Need for Genuine Powers. In N. Cartwright (Ed.), Causal Powers: what are they? why do we need them? what can be done with them and what cannot?. CPNSS, LSE.
- Counterfactuals in Economics: A CommentaryCartwright, N. (2007). Counterfactuals in Economics: A Commentary. In J. Keim Campbell, M. O’Rourke, & H. Silverman (Eds.), Causation and explanation. (pp. 191-216). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
- Against the 'System' Is There Value in Inconsistency?Cartwright, N. (2006). Against the ’System’ Is There Value in Inconsistency?. In L. Daston & C. Engel (Eds.), Series on Common Goods: Law, Politics and Economics. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
- From Causation to Explanation and BackCartwright, N. (2006). From Causation to Explanation and Back. In B. Leiter (Ed.), The Future of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
- How Can We Know What Made the Ratman Sick? Singular Causes and Population ProbabilitiesCartwright, N. (2005). How Can We Know What Made the Ratman Sick? Singular Causes and Population Probabilities. In Jokić A. (Ed.), Philosophy of Religion, Physics, and Psychology: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. New York: Prometheus Books.
- The Vanity of Rigour in Economics. Theoretical Models and Galilean ExperimentsCartwright, N. (2005). The Vanity of Rigour in Economics. Theoretical Models and Galilean Experiments. In P. Fontaine & R. Leonard (Eds.), The ’Experiment’ in the History of Economics.
- Another Philosopher Looks at Quantum MechanicsCartwright, N. (2005). Another Philosopher Looks at Quantum Mechanics. In Y. Ben-Menahem (Ed.), Hilary Putnam. Cambridge University Press.
- No God; No LawsCartwright, N. (2005). No God; No Laws. In E. Sindoni & S. Moriggi (Eds.), Dio, la Natura e la Legge. God and the Laws of Nature. Milan: Angelicum-Mondo X.
- My Understand to Philosophy [sic]Cartwright, N. (2005). My Understand to Philosophy [sic]. In K. Ouyang (Ed.), Dang dai Ying Mei zhu ming zhe xue jia xue shu zi shu [The Academic Self-Statements of Contemporary British and American Distinguished Philosophers].. Beijing: Ren min chu ban she. Publication in Chinese.
- LawsCartwright, N., Alexandrova, A., Efstathiou, S., Hamilton, A., & Muntean, I. (2005). Laws. In M. Smith & F. Jackson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
- Uncertainty in Econometrics: Evaluating Policy CounterfactualsCartwright, N., & Reiss, J. (2004). Uncertainty in Econometrics: Evaluating Policy Counterfactuals. In P. Mooslechner, H. Schuberth, & M. Schurz (Eds.), Economic Policy Under Uncertainty: The Role of Truth and Accountability in Policy Advice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- What Makes a Capacity a Disposition?,Cartwright, N. (2002). What Makes a Capacity a Disposition?,. In M. Kistler & B. Gnassounou (Eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. (pp. 195-206). London School of Economics.
- Modularity: It Can – and Generally Does – FailCartwright, N. (2001). Modularity: It Can – and Generally Does – Fail. In D. Costantini, M. Galavotti, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Stochastic Dependence and Causality. California: CSLI.
- Theories of Scientific Method: Models for the Physico-Mathematical SciencesCartwright, N., Psillos, S., & Chang, H. (2001). Theories of Scientific Method: Models for the Physico-Mathematical Sciences. In M. Nye (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Science Volume 5: Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
- Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio-Economic MachinesCartwright, N. (2001). Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio-Economic Machines. In U. Maki (Ed.), The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics. Cambridge University Press.
- Against the Completability of ScienceCartwright, N. (2000). Against the Completability of Science. In J. Wolff & M. Stone (Eds.), The Proper Ambition of Science. Routledge.
- An Empiricist Defence of Singular CausesCartwright, N. (2000). An Empiricist Defence of Singular Causes. In R. Teichmann (Ed.), Logic, Cause and Action: Essays in Honour of Elizabeth Anscombe. Cambridge University Press.
- Quantum Mechanics without the ObservablesCartwright, N. (2000). Quantum Mechanics without the Observables. In E. Agazzi & M. Pauri (Eds.), The Reality of the Unobservable: Observability, Unobservability, and their Impact on the Issue of Scientific Realism. Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Comments and RepliesCartwright, N. (1999). Comments and Replies. In M. Paul (Ed.), Proceedings of the Münster Colloquium. Münster: LIT Verlag.
- CapacitiesCartwright, N. (1999). Capacities. In J. Davis, D. Hands, & U. Mäki (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Models and the Limits of Theory: Quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS Model of SuperconductivityCartwright, N. (1999). Models and the Limits of Theory: Quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS Model of Superconductivity. In M. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press.
- Otto Neurath (1882-1945)Cartwright, N. (1998). Otto Neurath (1882-1945). In P. Kegan & E. Craig (Eds.), The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
- Causality, Independence and DeterminismCartwright, N. (1998). Causality, Independence and Determinism. In A. Gammerman (Ed.), Causal Models and Intelligent Data Analysis. Springer Verlag.
- CausationCartwright, N., & Cat, J. (1998). Causation. In P. Kegan & E. Craig (Eds.), The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
- Philosophy in the Earthly PlaneCartwright, N., & Uebel, T. (1997). Philosophy in the Earthly Plane. In E. Nemeth & F. Stadler (Eds.), Encyclopaedia and Utopia: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath. Münster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Why Physics?Cartwright, N. (1997). Why Physics?. In R. Penrose & M. Longair (Eds.), The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press.
- What is a Causal Structure?Cartwright, N. (1997). What is a Causal Structure?. In V. McKim & S. Turner (Eds.), Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Where Do Laws of Nature Come From?Cartwright, N. (1997). Where Do Laws of Nature Come From?. In C. Chauvire & A. Ogien (Eds.), Dialectica (pp. 65-78). Paris: EHESS.
- Comment on 'Harold Hotelling and the Neoclassical Dream', P. Mirowski and W. HandsCartwright, N. (1997). Comment on ’Harold Hotelling and the Neoclassical Dream’, P. Mirowski and W. Hands. In R. Backhouse, U. Mäki, A. Salanti, & D. Hausman (Eds.), Economics and Methodology. Macmillan and St Martin’s Press.
- Neurath Against MethodCartwright, N., & Cat, J. (1996). Neurath Against Method. In R. Giere & A. Richardson (Eds.), Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XVI. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Where in the World is the Quantum Measurement Problem?Cartwright, N. (1995). Where in the World is the Quantum Measurement Problem?. In L. Kruger & B. Falkenburg (Eds.), Physik, Philosophie und die Einheit der Wissenschaften: Grundlagen der exakten Naturawissenschaften. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
- Otto Neurath: Politics and the Unity of ScienceCartwright, N., Cat, J., & Chang, H. (1995). Otto Neurath: Politics and the Unity of Science. In P. Galison & D. Stump (Eds.), The Disunity of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Entries on “Neurath”, “Duhem”, “Feyerabend” and “Lakatos”Cartwright, N. (1995). Entries on “Neurath”, “Duhem”, “Feyerabend” and “Lakatos”. In E. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
- The Tool Box of Science: Tools for the Building of Models with a Superconductivity ExampleCartwright, N., Shomar, T., & Suarez, M. (1995). The Tool Box of Science: Tools for the Building of Models with a Superconductivity Example. In W. Herfel, W. Krajewski, I. Niiniluoto, & R. Wojcicki (Eds.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes. Rodopi.
- Causal Structures in Econometrics ModelsCartwright, N. (1995). Causal Structures in Econometrics Models. In D. Little (Ed.), On the Reliability of Economic Models (pp. 63-89). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0643-6_3
- How Laws Relate What Happens: Against a Regularity AccountCartwright, N. (1995). How Laws Relate What Happens: Against a Regularity Account. In H. Stachowiak (Ed.), Pragmatik: Handbuch Pragmatischen Denkens Band V. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
- Substantivalism and the Hole ArgumentCartwright, N., & Hoefer, C. (1994). Substantivalism and the Hole Argument. In J. Earman, A. Janis, G. Massey, & N. Rescher (Eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays Concerning the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Mill and Menger: Ideal Elements and Stable TendenciesCartwright, N. (1993). Mill and Menger: Ideal Elements and Stable Tendencies. In U. Maki (Ed.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Rodopi.
- How We Relate Theory to ObservationCartwright, N. (1993). How We Relate Theory to Observation. In P. Horwich (Ed.), World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Cambridge. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
- Marks and Probabilities: Two Ways to Find Causal StructureCartwright, N. (1993). Marks and Probabilities: Two Ways to Find Causal Structure. In F. Stadler (Ed.), Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments, Yearbook 1/93, Institute Vienna Circle. Münster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Aristotelian Natures and the Modern Experimental MethodCartwright, N. (1992). Aristotelian Natures and the Modern Experimental Method. In J. Earman (Ed.), Inference, Explanation and Other Philosophical Frustrations. University of California Press.
- Otto Neurath: Unification as the Way to SocialismCat, J., Chang, H., & Cartwright, N. (1991). Otto Neurath: Unification as the Way to Socialism. In Mittelstraβ J. (Ed.), Einheit der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter.
- How to Hunt Quantum CausesCartwright, N., & Jones, M. (1991). How to Hunt Quantum Causes. In W. Spohn (Ed.), Erkenntnis Orientated: A Centennial Volume for Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach (pp. 205-231). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3490-3_11
- Quantum Causes: The Lessons of the Bell InequalitiesCartwright, N. (1990). Quantum Causes: The Lessons of the Bell Inequalities. In P. Weingärtner & G. Schurz (Eds.), Philosophy of the Natural Sciences: Proceedings of the 13th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Vienna: Hölderlin-Pichler-Tempsky.
- Capacities and abstractions.Cartwright, N. (1989). Capacities and abstractions. In P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific Explanation. (pp. 349-356). University of Minnesota Press.
- Regular Associations and Singular CausesCartwright, N. (1988). Regular Associations and Singular Causes. In B. Skyrms & W. Harper (Eds.), Causation, Chance and Credence. Münster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- How to Tell a Common Cause: Generalisations of the Conjunctive Fork CriterionCartwright, N. (1988). How to Tell a Common Cause: Generalisations of the Conjunctive Fork Criterion. In J. Fetzer (Ed.), Probability and Causality. Dortrecht: D. Reidel.
- Ursachen und Mathematische PhysikCartwright, N. (1988). Ursachen und Mathematische Physik. In W. Muschik & E. Scheibe (Eds.), Philosophie, Physik, Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
- Philosophical Problems of Quantum Theory: The Response of American PhysicistsCartwright, N. (1987). Philosophical Problems of Quantum Theory: The Response of American Physicists. In L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, & M. Morgan (Eds.), The Probabilistic Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
- Max Born and the Reality of Quantum ProbabilitiesCartwright, N. (1987). Max Born and the Reality of Quantum Probabilities. In L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, & M. Morgan (Eds.), The Probabilistic Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
- Two Kinds of Teleological ExplanationCartwright, N. (1986). Two Kinds of Teleological Explanation. In A. Donagan, A. Perovich, & M. Wedin (Eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge. Dortrecht: D. Reidel.
- Fitting Facts to EquationsCartwright, N. (1986). Fitting Facts to Equations. In R. Grandy & R. Warner (Eds.), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories and Ends. Oxford University Press.
- What Makes Physics' Objects Abstract?Cartwright, N., & Mendell, H. (1984). What Makes Physics’ Objects Abstract?. In J. Cushing, C. Delaney, & G. Gutting (Eds.), Science and Reality. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- How the Measurement Problem is an Artefact of MathematicsCartwright, N. (1983). How the Measurement Problem is an Artefact of Mathematics. In R. Swinburne (Ed.), Space, Time and Causality. Dortrecht: D. Reidel.
- Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?Cartwright, N. (1980). Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?. In Pacific Philosophy Quarterly (pp. 64-75).
- Measuring Position ProbabilitiesCartwright, N. (1980). Measuring Position Probabilities. In P. Suppes (Ed.), Studies in the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science Association.
- Philosophy of PhysicsCartwright, N. (1979). Philosophy of Physics. In P. Asquith & H. Kyburg (Eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the PSA Critical Research Problems Conference. Philosophy of Science Association.
- How Do We Apply Science?Cartwright, N. (1974). How Do We Apply Science?. In R. Cohen, C. Hooker, A. Michalos, & J. Van Evra (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 713-719). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6
- A Dilemma for the Traditional Interpretation of Quantum MixturesCartwright, N. (1971). A Dilemma for the Traditional Interpretation of Quantum Mixtures. In K. Schaffner & R. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 251-258). Springer Verlag.
- Disagreement about Evidence-Based PolicyCowen, N., & Cartwright, N. (n.d.). Disagreement about Evidence-Based Policy. In M. Baghramian, J. A. Carter, & R. Cosker-Rowland (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement [Contracted by publisher]. Routledge.
Conference Paper
- X—Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of ScienceCartwright, N. (2020). X—Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of Science. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (pp. 237-252). https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoaa015
- Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of ScienceCartwright, N. (2020). Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of Science. In G. Longworth (Ed.), Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society : 140th Session 2019-2020.. The Aristotelian Society.
- Philosophy of Social Technology: Get on BoardCartwright, N. (2015). Philosophy of Social Technology: Get on Board. In John Dewey Lectures (pp. 98-116). American Philosophical Association.
- The Metaphysics of the Disunified WorldCartwright, N. (1994). The Metaphysics of the Disunified World. In D. Hull, M. Forbes, & R. M. Burian (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 357-364). Philosophy of Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192946
- A Case Study in Realism: Why Econometrics is Committed to CapacitiesCartwright, N. (1988). A Case Study in Realism: Why Econometrics is Committed to Capacities. In A. Fine & J. Leplin (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 190-197). Philosophy of Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1988.2.192883
- Causation and Physics: Causal Processes and Mathematical DerivationsCartwright, N. (1984). Causation and Physics: Causal Processes and Mathematical Derivations. In P. D. Asquith & P. Kitcher (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 391-404). Philosophy of Science Association.
- The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum MechanicsCartwright, N. (1978). The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics. In P. Asquith & I. Hacking (Eds.), Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 54-59). Philosophy of Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192625
Edited book
- Rethinking Order: After the Laws of NatureCartwright, N., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2016). Rethinking Order: After the Laws of Nature. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Philosophy of Social Science: A New IntroductionCartwright, N., & Montuschi, E. (Eds.). (2014). Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Idealization XII:
Correcting the Model. Idealization and Abstraction in the SciencesJones, M., & Cartwright, N. (Eds.). (2005). Idealization XII:Correcting the Model. Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences. Rodopi.
Journal Article
- Reliability Trumps TruthCartwright, N. (2024). Reliability Trumps Truth. Filozofia, 79(10), 1069-1082. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.1
- Objectivity and Intellectual Humility in Scientific Research: They’re Harder Than You ThinkCartwright, N., & Ray, F. (2023). Objectivity and Intellectual Humility in Scientific Research: They’re Harder Than You Think. European Review, 31(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1062798723000091
- Rigour versus the need for evidential diversityCartwright, N. (2021). Rigour versus the need for evidential diversity. Synthese, 199(5-6), 13095-13119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03368-1
- Mechanisms, laws and explanationCartwright, N., Pemberton, J., & Wieten, S. (2020). Mechanisms, laws and explanation. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(3), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00284-y
- Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice: Predicting What Will Work LocallyCartwright, N., & Joyce, K. (2020). Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice: Predicting What Will Work Locally. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1045-1082. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219866687
- Middle-range theory: Without it what could anyone do?Cartwright, N. (2020). Middle-range theory: Without it what could anyone do?. Theoria., 35(3), 269-323. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21479
- What is meant by ‘rigour’ in evidence-based educational policy and what’s so good about it.Cartwright, N. (2019). What is meant by ‘rigour’ in evidence-based educational policy and what’s so good about it. Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(1-2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2019.1617990
- What evidence should guidelines take note of?Cartwright, N. (2018). What evidence should guidelines take note of?. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(5), 1139-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12959
- Cross-disciplinary evidence principles for social-environmental sustainabilityGame, E., Tallis, H., Olander, L., Alexander, S., Busch, J., Cartwright, N., Kalies, E., Masuda, Y., Mupepele, A., Qiu, J., Rooney, A., Sills, E., & Sutherland, W. (2018). Cross-disciplinary evidence principles for social-environmental sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1(9), 452-454. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0141-x
- Reflections on Randomized Control TrialsDeaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Reflections on Randomized Control Trials. Social Science and Medicine, 210, 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.046
- Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trialsDeaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Social Science and Medicine, 210, 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005
- Meeting Our Standards for Educational Justice: Doing Our Best with the EvidenceJoyce, K., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Meeting Our Standards for Educational Justice: Doing Our Best with the Evidence. Theory and Research in Education, 16(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518756565
- Big Systems Versus Stocky Tangles: It Can Matter to the DetailsCartwright, N. (2018). Big Systems Versus Stocky Tangles: It Can Matter to the Details. Erkenntnis, 83(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9869-8
- Theoretical Practices That Work: Those That Mimic Nature’s OwnCartwright, N. (2018). Theoretical Practices That Work: Those That Mimic Nature’s Own. Spontaneous Generations, 9(1), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27045
- Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works”?Cowen, N., Virk, B., Mascarenhan-Keyes, S., & Cartwright, N. (2017). Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works”?. Critical Review, 29(3), 265-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1395223
- New trends in evolutionary biology: biological, philosophical and social science perspectivesBateson, P., Cartwright, N., Dupré, J., Laland, K., & Noble, D. (2017). New trends in evolutionary biology: biological, philosophical and social science perspectives. Interface Focus, 7(5), Article 20170051. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0051
- What’s so special about empirical adequacy?Bhakthavatsalam, S., & Cartwright, N. (2017). What’s so special about empirical adequacy?. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 7(3), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-017-0171-7
- Predicting What Will Happen When You InterveneCartwright, N., Hardie, J., & Stringer, R. (2017). Predicting What Will Happen When You Intervene. Clinical Social Work Journal, 45(3), 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0615-0
- Where is the Rigor When You Need It?Cartwright, N. (2016). Where is the Rigor When You Need It?. Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 10(2-4), 106-124. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000045
- Contingency and the order of natureCartwright, N. (2016). Contingency and the order of nature. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 58, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.008
- Loose Talk Kills: What’s Worrying about Unity of MethodCartwright, N. (2016). Loose Talk Kills: What’s Worrying about Unity of Method. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 768-778. https://doi.org/10.1086/687862
- Scientific Models versus Social RealityCartwright, N. (2015). Scientific Models versus Social Reality. Building Research and Information, 44(3-4), 334-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1083811
- Ceteris paribus laws need machines to generate themPemberton, J., & Cartwright, N. (2014). Ceteris paribus laws need machines to generate them. Erkenntnis, 79(10), 1745-1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9639-4
- A Question of NonsenseCartwright, N. (2014). A Question of Nonsense. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly עיון: רבעון פילוסופי, 63, 102-116.
- God's Order, Man's Order and the Order of NatureCartwright, N. (2013). God’s Order, Man’s Order and the Order of Nature. Euresis Journal, 5, 99-108.
- Knowing What We are Talking About: Why Evidence Doesn’t Always TravelCartwright, N. (2013). Knowing What We are Talking About: Why Evidence Doesn’t Always Travel. Evidence and Policy, 9(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413x662581
- Presidential Address: Will This Policy Work for You? Predicting Effectiveness Better: How Philosophy HelpsCartwright, N. (2012). Presidential Address: Will This Policy Work for You? Predicting Effectiveness Better: How Philosophy Helps. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 973-989. https://doi.org/10.1086/668041
- Warranting the use of causal claims: a non-trivial case for interdisciplinarityRol, M., & Cartwright, N. (2012). Warranting the use of causal claims: a non-trivial case for interdisciplinarity. Theoria., 27(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.4075
- Predicting what will happen when we act. What counts for warrant?Cartwright, N. (2011). Predicting what will happen when we act. What counts for warrant?. Preventive Medicine, 53(4-5), 221-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.011
- Hunting Causes and Using Them: Is There No Bridge from Here to There?Cartwright, N., & Efstathiou, S. (2011). Hunting Causes and Using Them: Is There No Bridge from Here to There?. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2011.605245
- A philosopher's view of the long road from RCTs to effectiveness.Cartwright, N. (2011). A philosopher’s view of the long road from RCTs to effectiveness. The Lancet, 377(9775), 1400-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736%2811%2960563-1
- Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?Fennell, D., & Cartwright, N. (2010). Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?. Synthese, 175(3), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9510-3
- Comments on Longworth and WeberCartwright, N. (2010). Comments on Longworth and Weber. Analysis, 70(2), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp158
- Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and EconomicsCartwright, N. (2010). Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Analysis, 70(2), 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp157
- The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectivenessCartwright, N., & Munro, E. (2010). The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(2), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01382.x
- Reply to Steel and Pearl: Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and EconomicsCartwright, N. (2010). Reply to Steel and Pearl: Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Economics and Philosophy, 26(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267110000088
- Evidence-Based Policy: Where Is Our Theory of Evidence?Cartwright, N., Goldfinch, A., & Howick, J. (2010). Evidence-Based Policy: Where Is Our Theory of Evidence?. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(4), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2010.0017
- What are randomised controlled trials good for?Cartwright, N. (2010). What are randomised controlled trials good for?. Philosophical Studies, 147(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9450-2
- How To Do Things with CausesCartwright, N. D. (2009). How To Do Things with Causes. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association., 83(2), 5-22.
- Measuring Research Impact: Special ProblemsCartwright, N. (2009). Measuring Research Impact: Special Problems. Consortium of Institutes of Advanced Study.
- Evidence-Based Policy: What's to be Done About RelevanceCartwright, N. (2009). Evidence-Based Policy: What’s to be Done About Relevance. Philosophical Studies., 143(1), 127-136.
- If No Capacities then No Credible Worlds. But Can Models Reveal Capacities?Cartwright, N. (2009). If No Capacities then No Credible Worlds. But Can Models Reveal Capacities?. Erkenntnis, 70(1), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9136-8
- Theories: Tools versus ModelsCartwright, N., & Suarez, M. (2008). Theories: Tools versus Models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39(1), 61-81.
- String theory under scrutinyCartwright, N., & Frigg, R. (2007). String theory under scrutiny. Physics World, September 2007, 14-15.
- Are RCTs the Gold Standard?Cartwright, N. (2007). Are RCTs the Gold Standard?. BioSocieties, 2(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1745855207005029
- Where is the Theory in our 'Theories' of Causality?Cartwright, N. (2007). Where is the Theory in our ’Theories’ of Causality?. Journal of Philosophy, CIII(2), 55-66.
- Well-Ordered Science: Evidence for UseCartwright, N. (2006). Well-Ordered Science: Evidence for Use. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 981-990. https://doi.org/10.1086/518803
- From Metaphysics to Method: Comments on Manipulability and the Causal Markov ConditionCartwright, N. (2006). From Metaphysics to Method: Comments on Manipulability and the Causal Markov Condition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(1), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi156
- Causation: One Word, Many ThingsCartwright, N. (2004). Causation: One Word, Many Things. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 805-819. https://doi.org/10.1086/426771
- Two Theorems on Invariance and CausalityCartwright, N. (2003). Two Theorems on Invariance and Causality. Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 203-224.
- Reply (dedicated to Nancy Cartwright’s The Dappled World)Cartwright, N. (2002). Reply (dedicated to Nancy Cartwright’s The Dappled World). Philosophical Books, 271-279.
- IntroductionCartwright, N. (2002). Introduction. Philosophical Books (dedicated to Nancy Cartwright’s The Dappled World), 43(4), 241-244.
- In Favour of Laws that are Not Ceteris Paribus After AllCartwright, N. (2002). In Favour of Laws that are Not Ceteris Paribus After All. Erkenntnis, 57, 425-439.
- Against Modularity, the Causal Markov Condition and Any Link Between the Two: Comments on Hausman and WoodwardCartwright, N. (2002). Against Modularity, the Causal Markov Condition and Any Link Between the Two: Comments on Hausman and Woodward. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 411-453. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/53.3.411
- Reply to P. Anderson's 'Review of The Dappled World'Cartwright, N. (2001). Reply to P. Anderson’s ’Review of The Dappled World’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(3), 495-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1355-2198%2801%2900012-0
- What is Wrong with Bayes Nets?Cartwright, N. (2001). What is Wrong with Bayes Nets?. The Monist, 84(2), 242-264.
- EndpieceCartwright, N., & Suárez, M. (2000). Endpiece. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 15, 123-128.
- The Limits of Exact Science, from Economics to PhysicsCartwright, N. (1999). The Limits of Exact Science, from Economics to Physics. Perspectives on Science, 7(3), 318-336.
- Causal Diversity and the Markov ConditionCartwright, N. (1999). Causal Diversity and the Markov Condition. Synthese, 121(1/2), 3-27.
- How Theories Relate: Takeovers or Partnerships?Cartwright, N. (1998). How Theories Relate: Takeovers or Partnerships?. Philosophia Naturalis, 35, 23-24.
- Models: The Blueprints for LawsCartwright, N. (1997). Models: The Blueprints for Laws. Philosophy of Science, 64, S292-S303. https://doi.org/10.1086/392608
- The Myth of Universalism: Theories of Science and Theories of JusticeCartwright, N., & Del Seta, M. (1997). The Myth of Universalism: Theories of Science and Theories of Justice. Discussion Paper Series, CPNSS, LSE.
- Science and Ethics: Reclaiming Some Neglected QuestionsCartwright, N., & Kitcher, P. (1996). Science and Ethics: Reclaiming Some Neglected Questions. Perspectives on Science, 4(2), 145-153.
- "Ceteris Paribus" Laws and Socio-Economic MachinesCartwright, N. (1995). "Ceteris Paribus" Laws and Socio-Economic Machines. The Monist, 78(3), 276-294. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19957831
- Quantum Technology: Where to Look for the Quantum Measurement ProblemCartwright, N. (1995). Quantum Technology: Where to Look for the Quantum Measurement Problem. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 38, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100007293
- False Idealization: A Philosophical Threat to Scientific MethodCartwright, N. (1995). False Idealization: A Philosophical Threat to Scientific Method. Philosophical Studies., 77, 339-352.
- Reply to Eells, Humphrey and MorrisonCartwright, N. (1995). Reply to Eells, Humphrey and Morrison. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (Symposium on Nancy Cartwright’s Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement), 55(1), 177-187.
- Probabilities and ExperimentsCartwright, N. (1995). Probabilities and Experiments. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 47-59.
- Précis of Nature’s Capacities and Their MeasurementCartwright, N. (1995). Précis of Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55(1), 153-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108313
- Fundamentalism vs. the Patchwork of LawsCartwright, N. (1994). Fundamentalism vs. the Patchwork of Laws. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 94(1), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/94.1.279
- Causality and Realism in the EPR ExperimentCartwright, N., & Chang, H. (1993). Causality and Realism in the EPR Experiment. Erkenntnis, 38, 169-190.
- In Defence of 'This Worldly Causality: Comments on van Fraassen's ‘Laws and Symmetry'Cartwright, N. (1993). In Defence of ’This Worldly Causality: Comments on van Fraassen’s ‘Laws and Symmetry’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53(2), 423-429.
- Is Natural Science 'Natural' Enough? A Reply to Phillip AllportCartwright, N. (1993). Is Natural Science ’Natural’ Enough? A Reply to Phillip Allport. Synthese, 94, 291-301.
- Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry CollinsCartwright, N. (1991). Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins. History of Political Economy, 23(1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-1-143
- Fables and ModelsCartwright, N. (1991). Fables and Models. Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society Suppliment, 65, 55-68.
- Can Wholism Reconcile the Inaccuracy of Theory with the Accuracy of Prediction?Cartwright, N. (1991). Can Wholism Reconcile the Inaccuracy of Theory with the Accuracy of Prediction?. Synthese, 89(1), 3-13.
- The Born-Einstein debate: Where application and explanation separateCartwright, N. (1989). The Born-Einstein debate: Where application and explanation separate. Synthese, 81(3), 271-282.
- Probability and Causality: Why Hume and Indeterminism Don't MixDupre, J., & Cartwright, N. (1988). Probability and Causality: Why Hume and Indeterminism Don’t Mix. Noûs, 22(4), 521-536.
- When Explanation Leads to InferenceCartwright, N. (1983). When Explanation Leads to Inference. Philosophical Topics, 13, 111-121.
- How Approximations Take Us Away From Theory and Towards the TruthCartwright, N., & Nordby, J. (1983). How Approximations Take Us Away From Theory and Towards the Truth. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 273-280.
- The Reality of Causes in a World of Instrumental LawsCartwright, N. (1980). The Reality of Causes in a World of Instrumental Laws. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 38-48.
- The Truth Doesn't Explain MuchCartwright, N. (1980). The Truth Doesn’t Explain Much. American Philosophy Quarterly, 17(2), 159-163.
- Do Token-Token Identity Theories Show Why We Don't Need Reductionism?Cartwright, N. (1979). Do Token-Token Identity Theories Show Why We Don’t Need Reductionism?. Philosophical Studies., 36(1), 85-90.
- Causal Laws and Effective StrategiesCartwright, N. (1979). Causal Laws and Effective Strategies. Noûs, 13(4), 419-437.
- Comments on Wesley Salmon's ‘science and religion ...’Cartwright, N. (1978). Comments on Wesley Salmon’s ‘science and religion ...’. Philosophical Studies., 33(2), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00571885
- The Sum Rule Has Not Been TestedCartwright, N. (1977). The Sum Rule Has Not Been Tested. Philosophy of Science, 44(1), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1086/288727
- A Non-Negative Wigner-Type DistributionCartwright, N. (1975). A Non-Negative Wigner-Type Distribution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 83(1), 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371%2876%2990145-x
- Superposition and macroscopic observation.Cartwright, N. (1974). Superposition and macroscopic observation. Synthese, 29(1-4), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00484959
- Correlations without joint distributions in quantum mechanics.Cartwright, N. (1974). Correlations without joint distributions in quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 4(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00708563
Other (Digital/Visual Media)
- The limitations of randomised controlled trialsDeaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2016, November 9). The limitations of randomised controlled trials [VOX, CEPR Policy Portal].
- Measuring the Impact of PhilosophyBovens, L., & Cartwright, N. (2010, January 1). Measuring the Impact of Philosophy [II].
Other (Print)
- Why Big Theories are Here to StayCartwright, N. (2019, November 14 – 2019, November 15). Why Big Theories are Here to Stay [Keynote]. Presented at «The Theoretical University» in the Data Age. Have the great theories become obsolete?, Bielefield University.
Working Paper
- Making predictions of programme success more reliableCartwright, N., Charlton, L., Juden, M., Munslow, T., & Williams, R. (2020). Making predictions of programme success more reliable.
- Using middle-level theory to improve programme and evaluation design.Cartwright, N. (2020). Using middle-level theory to improve programme and evaluation design.
- Using middle-level theory to improve programme and evaluation design.Cartwright, N. (2020). Using middle-level theory to improve programme and evaluation design.
- Mechanisms, ceteris paribus laws and covering-law explanationCartwright, N., Pemberton, J., & Wieten, S. (2018). Mechanisms, ceteris paribus laws and covering-law explanation.
- Stakeholder engagement for development impact and learningCartwright, N., Oliver, S., Gough, D., Stewart, R., Dickson, K., Bangpan, M., Pells, K., Hargreaves, J., & Roche, C. (2018). Stakeholder engagement for development impact and learning.
- Designing evaluations to provide evidence to inform action in new settingsCartwright, N., Davey, C., Hargreaves, J., Hassan, S., Gough, D., Humphreys, M., Masset, E., Oliver, S., Prost, A., & Bonell, C. (2018). Designing evaluations to provide evidence to inform action in new settings.
- Are laws of nature consistent with contingency?Cartwright, N., & Merlussi, P. (2016). Are laws of nature consistent with contingency?.
- A Theory of MeasurementCartwright, N., Bradburn, N. M., & Fuller, J. (2016). A Theory of Measurement.
- Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trialsCartwright, N., & Deaton, A. (2016). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.
- Making the Most of the Evidence: Evidence-based policy in the classroomCartwright, N., Cowen, N., Virk, B., & Mascarenhas-Keyes, S. (2015). Making the Most of the Evidence: Evidence-based policy in the classroom.
- Single Case Causes: What is Evidence and WhyCartwright, N. (2015). Single Case Causes: What is Evidence and Why.
- Making the Most of the Evidence in Education: A Guide for Working Out What Works .... Here and NowCowen, N., & Cartwright, N. (2014). Making the Most of the Evidence in Education: A Guide for Working Out What Works .... Here and Now.
- Deliberating Policy: Where morals and methods mix – and not always for the bestCartwright, N. (2014). Deliberating Policy: Where morals and methods mix – and not always for the best.